Tue, 23 Dec 2003 18:53:00 UTC
SCO claims ownership of something Linus remembers writing
Things like this
are why revision control systems should be mandatory in free software
projects. It would be nice if we weren't relying
entirely on Linus's memory.
(last updated Tue, 23 Dec 2003 18:53:40 UTC)
A revision control system really wouldn't have helped, since it still doesn't tell you the source of the code that has been checked in. At that point, you're still relying on the memory of the person who wrote it where they got the code from...
All a revision control system will tell you is when code was checked in (and since Linus was releasing new kernels every few days, this would give you only a slightly smaller granuality in time) and maybe a checkin comment. But that isn't necessarily going to tell you whether the author wrote the code himself or cribbed it from some other project.
posted by Ted Tso from 66.92.109.27 at Wed, 24 Dec 2003 04:04:42 UTC (updated Tue, 23 Dec 2003 18:53:40 UTC)
True. But it seems to me that "I remember doing this, and look, it appeared between these versions" is not as good as "I remember doing this, and look, these logs say someone logge in as me checked it in that day."
This is likely my personal bias, though.
posted by Karl from 65.41.34.71 at Thu, 25 Dec 2003 03:39:32 UTC (updated Tue, 23 Dec 2003 18:53:40 UTC)
Comments are disabled on this entry.